<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C6 Top Mac Apps 2007:&#160;Productivity</title>
	<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/</link>
	<description>up to the minute updates</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tate</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-23617</link>
		<author>Tate</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-23617</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you about how useful CD is (especially in its email integration, which makes adoption much more likely than the other alternatives in my opinion), but the nature of the projects I personally manage puts most of the load on me and the architecture proved to be just a little too  much for my situation.  (Don't these people know I've got to GEEK OUT every once and a while even if every task seems to be assigned to me?)

Anyway, there is a new theme in PP (Marine) that makes it look pretty nice and I'm hoping to use it to ramp up the researchers and staff I work with to the idea of an online collaboration tool.  Until then I'm focussing my geek, GTD energy towards my personal task organization via OmniFocus - etc.  Unfortunately, my girlfriend is not a MAC user and I've also been trying to use Remember the Milk for our home stuff, which has been clunky for me.  I think a true, errorless and safe synching of these task management programs is really important and a yet undiscovered land.

I actually thought about your iGTD screencast when I saw some of the iGTD2 features since they really do seem to be super-powerful and feature-rich.  Maybe this will be the thing that causes me to break down and install Leopard despite all the scary comments on Apple's site!  Your original iGTD screencast is what made me see the value in harvesting to-do's right from my email.  So, maybe  an even more comprehensive system can be created with iGTD2 if the interface gets a little more useable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you about how useful CD is (especially in its email integration, which makes adoption much more likely than the other alternatives in my opinion), but the nature of the projects I personally manage puts most of the load on me and the architecture proved to be just a little too  much for my situation.  (Don&#8217;t these people know I&#8217;ve got to GEEK OUT every once and a while even if every task seems to be assigned to me?)</p>
<p>Anyway, there is a new theme in PP (Marine) that makes it look pretty nice and I&#8217;m hoping to use it to ramp up the researchers and staff I work with to the idea of an online collaboration tool.  Until then I&#8217;m focussing my geek, GTD energy towards my personal task organization via OmniFocus - etc.  Unfortunately, my girlfriend is not a MAC user and I&#8217;ve also been trying to use Remember the Milk for our home stuff, which has been clunky for me.  I think a true, errorless and safe synching of these task management programs is really important and a yet undiscovered land.</p>
<p>I actually thought about your iGTD screencast when I saw some of the iGTD2 features since they really do seem to be super-powerful and feature-rich.  Maybe this will be the thing that causes me to break down and install Leopard despite all the scary comments on Apple&#8217;s site!  Your original iGTD screencast is what made me see the value in harvesting to-do&#8217;s right from my email.  So, maybe  an even more comprehensive system can be created with iGTD2 if the interface gets a little more&nbsp;useable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-23615</link>
		<author>brett</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-23615</guid>
		<description>The Things interface is great, but I'm really looking forward to iGTD2 smoothing out because it's got powerful options for grouping notes, links and even files to tasks and projects. Not as pretty, but should fit my needs better than any of the others at this point.

One thing I love about CD is that it notifies selected individuals of changes via email, and if they respond to that email, it posts comments to the page, file or discussion. That keeps my less technically inclined employees interested and collaborating. I've even got a couple of clients down with the system, but I don't push it on anyone.

I'm locked in with CD for a while (and very happy), but I'll have to take a peek at Project Pier. I looked at Active Collab when I was researching this, but it felt too unfinished at the time. The features available through CD were well worth the money for me :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Things interface is great, but I&#8217;m really looking forward to iGTD2 smoothing out because it&#8217;s got powerful options for grouping notes, links and even files to tasks and projects. Not as pretty, but should fit my needs better than any of the others at this point.</p>
<p>One thing I love about CD is that it notifies selected individuals of changes via email, and if they respond to that email, it posts comments to the page, file or discussion. That keeps my less technically inclined employees interested and collaborating. I&#8217;ve even got a couple of clients down with the system, but I don&#8217;t push it on anyone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m locked in with CD for a while (and very happy), but I&#8217;ll have to take a peek at Project Pier. I looked at Active Collab when I was researching this, but it felt too unfinished at the time. The features available through CD were well worth the money for me&nbsp;:).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tate</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-23613</link>
		<author>Tate</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-23613</guid>
		<description>I actually originally got to your website through iGTD and its interesting that your using OmniFocus now.  I am too, but I have to say iGTD2 looks pretty cool as does Things and once they get the kinks worked out I might be switching since I like the look of the interfaces a little better.

I tried out Central Desktop (CD) for a while and did like it.  Unfortunately, most of the researchers I manage projects for really just want to check up on progress and didn't "adopt" the true collaborative potential.  So, it was hard for me to justify the monthly expense.

I ended up installing Project Pier (the still open source fork of active collab) as a place on our servers to store all relevant files for a certain project as well as some very light task management (again more just to demonstrate progress.)

Project Pier is a different kind of alternative that might be useful to some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually originally got to your website through iGTD and its interesting that your using OmniFocus now.  I am too, but I have to say iGTD2 looks pretty cool as does Things and once they get the kinks worked out I might be switching since I like the look of the interfaces a little better.</p>
<p>I tried out Central Desktop (CD) for a while and did like it.  Unfortunately, most of the researchers I manage projects for really just want to check up on progress and didn&#8217;t &#8220;adopt&#8221; the true collaborative potential.  So, it was hard for me to justify the monthly expense.</p>
<p>I ended up installing Project Pier (the still open source fork of active collab) as a place on our servers to store all relevant files for a certain project as well as some very light task management (again more just to demonstrate progress.)</p>
<p>Project Pier is a different kind of alternative that might be useful to&nbsp;some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ds</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-21328</link>
		<author>ds</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-21328</guid>
		<description>Enjoying following your journeys. Just curious--would Daylite from Market Circle do you any good? (I tried it and gave up, but I kept feeling that a better man than I could get some good mileage out of it).

ds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoying following your journeys. Just curious&#8212;would Daylite from Market Circle do you any good? (I tried it and gave up, but I kept feeling that a better man than I could get some good mileage out of it).&nbsp;ds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17842</link>
		<author>brett</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17842</guid>
		<description>Serendipitous.  I ran into a few hangups in our system and stayed up all night last night going through over 50 different web apps ranging from simple time tracking to full productivity suites.  Wrike was among them.  It was definitely a top contender but I ended up really liking Central Desktop in combination with Harvest (nice widgets) for time tracking.  Central Desktop combines all of the collaboration tools I need with the selective client access privileges and task delegation, so I'm going to give it a test run for a few days.  We'll see where I end up.  Zoho's been good, and their suite in its entirety is amazing, but it's not coming together as cohesively as I'd like.  This got kind of long for a comment, didn't it?  I've been awake for too long...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serendipitous.  I ran into a few hangups in our system and stayed up all night last night going through over 50 different web apps ranging from simple time tracking to full productivity suites.  Wrike was among them.  It was definitely a top contender but I ended up really liking Central Desktop in combination with Harvest (nice widgets) for time tracking.  Central Desktop combines all of the collaboration tools I need with the selective client access privileges and task delegation, so I&#8217;m going to give it a test run for a few days.  We&#8217;ll see where I end up.  Zoho&#8217;s been good, and their suite in its entirety is amazing, but it&#8217;s not coming together as cohesively as I&#8217;d like.  This got kind of long for a comment, didn&#8217;t it?  I&#8217;ve been awake for too&nbsp;long&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Stivens</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17841</link>
		<author>Rob Stivens</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17841</guid>
		<description>Good post! Since you're interested in project management software I thought you might be interested in my experience. I've tried a couple of those tools you wrote about. Zoho projects didn't click with our team, seemed to be not flexible enough. Now we set several projects in &lt;a href="http://www.wrike.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wrike&lt;/a&gt;. The tool proves to be perfect for small and medium teams. It's email based so it's very easy to follow the progess. The great thing is we can involve our clients into collaboration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post! Since you&#8217;re interested in project management software I thought you might be interested in my experience. I&#8217;ve tried a couple of those tools you wrote about. Zoho projects didn&#8217;t click with our team, seemed to be not flexible enough. Now we set several projects in <a href="http://www.wrike.com" rel="nofollow">Wrike</a>. The tool proves to be perfect for small and medium teams. It&#8217;s email based so it&#8217;s very easy to follow the progess. The great thing is we can involve our clients into&nbsp;collaboration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Business Live, everything about markets! &#187; C6 Top Mac Apps 2007: Productivity</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17506</link>
		<author>Blogging Business Live, everything about markets! &#187; C6 Top Mac Apps 2007: Productivity</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17506</guid>
		<description>[...] iTech News Net &#124; Latest Tech News, Gadget News and more&#8230; wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt This post is part of a series (C6 Top Mac Apps 2007):C6 Top Mac Apps 2007: Productivity Well, the year is quickly coming to an end and I thought I’d chronicle our latest Mac app adventures. So what makes this particular list of OS X app picks special? First, I’m not doing reruns, so you’re not going to hear about TextMate and Quicksilver all over again. This list assumes you’ve picked up on the basics from at least one of the gazillion top ten lists on Digg, and made your own decisions. Second [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] iTech News Net | Latest Tech News, Gadget News and more&#8230; wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt This post is part of a series (C6 Top Mac Apps 2007):C6 Top Mac Apps 2007: Productivity Well, the year is quickly coming to an end and I thought I’d chronicle our latest Mac app adventures. So what makes this particular list of OS X app picks special? First, I’m not doing reruns, so you’re not going to hear about TextMate and Quicksilver all over again. This list assumes you’ve picked up on the basics from at least one of the gazillion top ten lists on Digg, and made your own decisions. Second&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17499</link>
		<author>mac</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/11/22/c6-top-mac-apps-2007-productivity/#comment-17499</guid>
		<description>[...] C6 Top Mac Apps 2007: Productivity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] C6 Top Mac Apps 2007: Productivity&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
