<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ModX&#160;Review</title>
	<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/</link>
	<description>up to the minute updates</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-14409</link>
		<author>Debbie</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-14409</guid>
		<description>Hi there!  I also enjoy using MODx and created a one page overview with links to free MODx templates, examples of sites powered by MODx, and other reviews comparing MODx to Wordpress, Drupal, Joomla and Expression Engine.
http://www.squidoo.com/modxcms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!  I also enjoy using MODx and created a one page overview with links to free MODx templates, examples of sites powered by MODx, and other reviews comparing MODx to Wordpress, Drupal, Joomla and Expression Engine.<br />
<a href="http://www.squidoo.com/modxcms" rel="nofollow">http://www.squidoo.com/modxcms</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Development Forums</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-14047</link>
		<author>Web Development Forums</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-14047</guid>
		<description>MODx is my professional CMS of choice.

Even though it's not defined as a "CMS" ... but a "framework" since you can build anything you want from it.

MODx FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MODx is my professional CMS of choice.</p>
<p>Even though it&#8217;s not defined as a &#8220;CMS&#8221; &#8230; but a &#8220;framework&#8221; since you can build anything you want from it.</p>
<p>MODx&nbsp;FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Management Systems (CMS) Reviews : Voodoochilli Design Blog Content Management Systems (CMS) Reviews content custom cmsâ€™s, website, would,</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-2999</link>
		<author>Content Management Systems (CMS) Reviews : Voodoochilli Design Blog Content Management Systems (CMS) Reviews content custom cmsâ€™s, website, would,</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-2999</guid>
		<description>[...] found a very positive, and more detailed review where by the author says â€œIt blows me away that I still even hear about Joomla and Mambo while [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] found a very positive, and more detailed review where by the author says â€œIt blows me away that I still even hear about Joomla and Mambo while&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-1395</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>I used Textpattern for many sites and loved it.  It is wonderful.  I also use MODx a LOT and love it too.  TXP lends itself more to article-driven sites.  MODx is more flexible IMHO.  Though both are extremely awesome!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Textpattern for many sites and loved it.  It is wonderful.  I also use MODx a LOT and love it too.  TXP lends itself more to article-driven sites.  MODx is more flexible IMHO.  Though both are extremely awesome!&nbsp;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-984</link>
		<author>Susan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Regarding MAMP, I develop MODx templates and apps on it, and also the beta of MAMP Pro. No problem, either php4 or php5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding MAMP, I develop MODx templates and apps on it, and also the beta of MAMP Pro. No problem, either php4 or&nbsp;php5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-826</link>
		<author>brett</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>I love Drupal for "organic" sites that require a lot of user interaction, but don't find it ideal for pseudo-static sites that just require a basic CMS.  I'm working on a ModX site at this very moment and finding it pretty simple and intuitive.  There are a few shortcomings, but I'm really liking the flexibility of the interface.  I have to admit that my experience with Textpattern has been limited and I'm willing to give it another shot.  When I tried it out I didn't find it to be friendly enough for my clients, but I haven't looked at it for a long time and didn't give it much of a chance when I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Drupal for &#8220;organic&#8221; sites that require a lot of user interaction, but don&#8217;t find it ideal for pseudo-static sites that just require a basic CMS.  I&#8217;m working on a ModX site at this very moment and finding it pretty simple and intuitive.  There are a few shortcomings, but I&#8217;m really liking the flexibility of the interface.  I have to admit that my experience with Textpattern has been limited and I&#8217;m willing to give it another shot.  When I tried it out I didn&#8217;t find it to be friendly enough for my clients, but I haven&#8217;t looked at it for a long time and didn&#8217;t give it much of a chance when I&nbsp;did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GiorgosK</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-825</link>
		<author>GiorgosK</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>I have looked at modxcms but, I personally like &lt;a href="http://drupal.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;Drupal&lt;/a&gt; a lot.  The only sin that it has commited so far is that it has not attracted enough web designers to make it look stunning but, this is changing rapidly ... other than that its a brilliant cms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have looked at modxcms but, I personally like <a href="http://drupal.org" rel="nofollow">Drupal</a> a lot.  The only sin that it has commited so far is that it has not attracted enough web designers to make it look stunning but, this is changing rapidly &#8230; other than that its a brilliant&nbsp;cms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManiquÃ­</title>
		<link>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-785</link>
		<author>ManiquÃ­</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.circlesixdesign.com/2007/01/01/modx-review/#comment-785</guid>
		<description>I have heard about ModXCMS before... I tend to think that it's just a copy of Textpattern. Of course, it could have many improvements.

But i'm in love with Textpattern. Have you ever tried it?
I think there is nothing you can't make with TxP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard about ModXCMS before&#8230; I tend to think that it&#8217;s just a copy of Textpattern. Of course, it could have many improvements.</p>
<p>But i&#8217;m in love with Textpattern. Have you ever tried it?<br />
I think there is nothing you can&#8217;t make with&nbsp;TxP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
